Apr
12
2004

the plot thickens. or something.

I remember that when I was in high school, getting into The Right College was a kind of science — almost a game — with applicants required to have the Perfect Resume, its precise formulation known only by the all-powerful admissions counselors who make the decisions. Competing against an ever-increasing talent pool (due in large part to both the expanding population and the rising share of that population deciding to apply for college), high school students face the challenge of having to somehow differentiate themselves from their competition — to market themselves — by having the longest, most varied and accomplished resumes possible. Join — no, lead — school club x. Play for school sport y and win the state championship. Score fabulous test scores and win academic award z.

I’ve read / heard two news stories today about a possible change in that way of thinking — a “slow down” movement aimed at encouraging college officials, students and their parents to relax.

Sort of. But maybe not really.

But what is a student, trained to be hyper-efficient and overachieving, to do? The “slow down” movement on campuses reveals the many mixed messages sent out to students. Universities tout their exclusivity, their low admissions rates, and scour the country for the most desirable students. Then, the newest freshman class of academic superstars - who also happen to be prize-winning scientists, professional-caliber musicians, athletes, leaders and do-gooders - arrive on campus and are promptly told to cool it (but still get high grades to get into good graduate schools).

At Bowdoin College this year, everyone from the president, Barry Mills, to the dean of student affairs, Craig W. Bradley, to the director of counseling, Bob Vilas, has been talking about savoring education, taking the time to enjoy learning. The students are all for the joy of learning. In fact, many of them say that Bowdoin, a small elite college in Brunswick, Me., has been a happy intellectual awakening after the grim pursuit of grades and extracurriculars that was high school.

But as Karen Jacobson, a senior, pointed out, if she and her classmates had rebelled against the résumé-building path to college that had been laid out for them, they might not have gotten into Bowdoin at all.

• New York Times: “Straight A’s Can Hurt a College Education” (04/11/04)
• Marketplace Morning Report: “‘Tis the Season for Admissions” (04/12/04) (RealPlayer audio)

Comments

Eerier, did you realize we used the same Blog title yesterday? That’s some *weird* and waaaacky stuff!

Posted by The Girl on April 13, 2004 8:05 AM

I noticed that last night, right after I posted this entry. It’s incrediby eerie.

Posted by alykat on April 13, 2004 9:26 PM

Thursday’s New York Times had an interesting article about another challenge faced by college admissions boards: economic diversity, with upper-class students beating out lower- and middle-class students for admission. (“As Wealthy Fill Top Colleges, New Efforts to Level the Field” - 04/22/04)

Given the broader range of extracurricular opportunities available to upper-class students by virtue of their class, the unlikelihood that those students would tap into schools’ already overspent financial aid coffers and ever-increasing tuition costs (particularly at private universities), it makes sense that they hold a certain advantage.

Officials long accustomed to discussing racial diversity are instead taking steps to improve economic diversity. They say they are worried that their universities are reproducing social advantage instead of serving as an engine of mobility.

“It’s very much an issue of fundamental fairness,” Lawrence H. Summers, the president of Harvard, said in an interview. “An important purpose of institutions like Harvard is to give everybody a shot at the American dream” …

Over all, at the 42 most selective state universities, including the flagship campuses in California, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan and New York, 40 percent of this year’s freshmen come from families making more than $100,000, up from about 32 percent in 1999, according to the Higher Education Research Institute. Nationwide, fewer than 20 percent of families make that much money…

“There has been over the last several decades a whole slew of efforts to level the playing field for college admissions,” said Alexander W. Astin, a professor of higher education at U.C.L.A. “In spite of all these efforts, access for poor kids and kids of less well-educated parents has not improved. And for kids in the middle, it’s actually declined.”

Posted by alykat on April 24, 2004 7:55 PM

Post a comment

As a spam-control measure, your comment may require my approval before it will appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting. To avoid the moderation delay, consider filling in your e-mail address. It won't appear on the site, but I use it to whitelist frequent commenters so their comments appear automatically.


The following HTML tags are permitted (if you want to use them):
p, br, a href, b, strong, u, i, em, ol, ul, li, cite, blockquote